This paper (MSR ‘26) introduces AIDev, a dataset of 932,791 agent-authored pull requests (“Agentic-PRs”) drawn from 116,211 real-world GitHub repositories and 72,189 developers, authored by five coding agents: OpenAI Codex, Devin, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code, with a dataset cutoff of August 1, 2025. A curated subset of 33,596 Agentic-PRs from 2,807 repositories with more than 100 GitHub stars is additionally enriched with review comments, commit-level diffs, issue links, and full pull-request event timelines. The dataset is distributed through Hugging Face and Zenodo, with example Jupyter notebooks published on GitHub.

The paper motivates AIDev by arguing that much of the existing evidence on AI coding agents derives from controlled studies, benchmarks, or small-scale deployments rather than large-scale real-world activity, and proposes it as a foundation for empirical study of adoption, code-patch characteristics, testing behavior, review dynamics, and failure patterns and risks of coding agents operating on real repositories.

Key Points

  • Introduces AIDev, aggregating 932,791 Agentic-PRs across 116,211 repositories and 72,189 developers, authored by five agents (OpenAI Codex, Devin, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code)
  • Provides a curated enriched subset of 33,596 Agentic-PRs from 2,807 repositories with over 100 GitHub stars, additionally carrying comments, reviews, commits, and related issues
  • Includes automated PR-purpose annotations (bug fix, feature, documentation, etc.) following the Conventional Commits categories, generated with GPT-based classification
  • Proposes example research questions across five areas: adoption and practices, code patch characteristics, testing behavior, review dynamics, and failure patterns and risks
  • Situates Agentic-PRs against earlier automation research in its related-work review, noting that rule-based and dependency-update bots rarely exhibit the initiative, contextual reasoning, or dialogical interaction seen in human contributors, and that PRs involving LLM assistance take longer to close and receive heavier review than routine bot contributions

Notes

  • The dataset’s cutoff date is August 1, 2025; findings drawn from it reflect agent behavior up to that date only
  • The paper is presented at MSR ‘26 rather than being an empirical-findings paper — it describes the dataset’s structure and proposes research questions rather than answering them