Type: url
Status: generated
Language: en
Summary
A developer who has Claude audit and revise project plans before implementation reports that the automated audit-and-revise loop often failed to converge, turning into a “Whac-A-Mole” or seesaw in which each fix drew a new criticism from a different angle. Restricting the audit of a reasonably complete plan to logical contradictions only made the loop converge within a few rounds, which the author explains by contradictions being finite while criticism under a broad scope is not; the author also notes related ideas found afterwards (criteria drift, oscillatory convergence, fixing the rubric in advance) and argues none states this scope-narrowing directly.